Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Neuron23 Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Neuron23 Inc. currently has 4 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 4 actions are distributed across 4 distinct examiners, meaning that every pending matter is being handled by a different individual. This level of examiner diversity is matched by the 4 distinct art units involved in the company's prosecution. The busiest examiner for the company is CHAO, ALLEN, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there are 4 pending office actions in total, this examiner handles 1 of the company's current pending workload.

The distribution of 4 pending office actions across 4 art units suggests that Neuron23 Inc. is pursuing a diverse range of technical claims within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. This variety provides the company with multiple channels of feedback from the patent office. The prosecution strategy must be tailored to the specific standards of 4 different art units and the individual preferences of 4 different examiners. This diversified examiner engagement reduces the impact of any 1 examiner's decision on the overall portfolio. Practitioners should coordinate their approach to ensure consistency across the 4 distinct examiners while respecting the unique technical standards of each art unit. The company's focus on Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals is currently split between these 4 active prosecution paths.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§102 only2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHAO, ALLEN 1 60.0% +0.0%
FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES 1 62.2% +41.2%
JOHANNSEN, DIANA B 1 53.2% +42.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18032073 METHODS OF TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH WILD-TYPE LRRK2 JOHANNSEN, DIANA B —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18375063 KINASE MODULATORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES 92d overdue
18032073 METHODS OF TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH WILD-TYPE LRRK2 JOHANNSEN, DIANA B —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1622 1
1626 1
1682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18512306 LRRK2 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF CHAO, ALLEN 1622 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2023
18375063 KINASE MODULATORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES 1626 §102 Final Rejection 92d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2023
18032073 METHODS OF TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH WILD-TYPE LRRK2 JOHANNSEN, DIANA B 1682 §101§102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 14, 2023

Managing Neuron23 Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Neuron23 Inc. have?

Neuron23 Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Neuron23 Inc. applications?

Allen Chao has the most, with 1 of Neuron23 Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Neuron23 Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month