Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Neurorays LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, SEBASTIAN X LUKJAN, and 1 distinct art unit. SEBASTIAN X LUKJAN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling 1 pending office action.
The 1 pending office action is the only active matter for the company at this time. Because it is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution team can tailor its approach to the specific habits of SEBASTIAN X LUKJAN. The 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technical subject matter is focused within a single specialized group. This concentration in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area allows for a direct line of communication with the USPTO.
With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the portfolio lacks the complexity of multi-examiner coordination. The 1 pending office action represents the full scope of the company's current legal challenges in patent procurement. Practitioners should note that SEBASTIAN X LUKJAN is the sole individual responsible for the examination of this portfolio. The 1 distinct art unit provides a stable environment for resolving the pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUKJAN, SEBASTIAN X | 1 | 76.3% | +40.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19245147 | Fixation Target for Macula Protection | LUKJAN, SEBASTIAN X | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19245147 | Fixation Target for Macula Protection | LUKJAN, SEBASTIAN X | 3792 | §103 | Final Rejection | 15d | Pending | Jun 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial