Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The matter is located within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a singular point of prosecution for the company. This concentration indicates that the company's current patent efforts are focused on a specific technical review within the transportation sector. The alignment of 1 action, 1 examiner, and 1 art unit creates a very direct prosecution path.

LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This single action represents the total pending prosecution for the company. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution process is highly streamlined. However, it also means that the company's immediate success is entirely dependent on the findings of this 1 individual. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of this examiner within the context of their 1 art unit. This singular focus defines the current portfolio and requires a targeted approach to address the examiner's technical concerns.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G 1 22.5% +31.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19216386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF EEG-BASED BIOMARKER DISCOVERY AND COMMERCIALIZATION FOR PERSONALIZED DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF BRAIN DISORDERS LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19216386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF EEG-BASED BIOMARKER DISCOVERY AND COMMERCIALIZATION FOR PERSONALIZED DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF BRAIN DISORDERS LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3683 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19216386 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF EEG-BASED BIOMARKER DISCOVERY AND COMMERCIALIZATION FOR PERSONALIZED DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF BRAIN DISORDERS LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G 3683 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2025

Managing Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI have?

Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI applications?

William G Lultschik has the most, with 1 of Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI's pending office actions.

What technology area are Neuroscience Software Inc. Dba Brainify AI's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month