Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Neurospring maintains a patent portfolio concentrated in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There is currently 1 pending office action reported for the company. This workload is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. Such a distribution indicates that the current prosecution activity is centralized, with the active matter following a lone administrative route through the patent office. This centralization suggests that the company's current legal efforts are focused on a specific technological advancement.
EDOUARD, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER is the busiest examiner assigned to the portfolio. This examiner is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since this individual manages the full extent of the company's active patent prosecution, practitioners can employ a targeted approach to addressing the pending requirements. Legal strategy can be optimized by analyzing the specific historical patterns of this examiner, as they represent the sole gatekeeper for the company's current applications in this technology area. By concentrating on the procedural history of this single examiner, the company can better anticipate potential hurdles in the mechanical systems domain.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDOUARD, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER | 1 | 23.7% | +39.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17272596 | MEDICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASE | EDOUARD, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17272596 | MEDICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASE | EDOUARD, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17272596 | MEDICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASE | EDOUARD, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER | 3683 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 01, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNeurospring has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jonathan Christopher Edouard has the most, with 1 of Neurospring's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
