Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
New Works Aps currently maintains a patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This active prosecution is located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the filing. The examination is being conducted by 1 distinct examiner, MARTINEZ, VANESSA, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action.
Because there is 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution path is centralized. MARTINEZ, VANESSA is the busiest examiner, as she manages the only active action in the portfolio. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are confined to a single examination environment.
For practitioners, the focus on 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit means that the strategy for the 1 pending office action is the primary concern. Success in this single instance will determine the immediate status of the portfolio. The lack of multiple pending office actions or examiners simplifies the coordination required for this entity's patent prosecution. This concentration allows for a targeted approach to resolving the current office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTINEZ, VANESSA | 1 | 97.8% | -6.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35517798 | Lamp | MARTINEZ, VANESSA | 380d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2934 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35517798 | Lamp | MARTINEZ, VANESSA | 2934 | §112 | Final Rejection | 380d overdue | Pending | Jun 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial