Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Newfrey LLC

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Newfrey LLC has 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 4 actions are assigned to 4 distinct examiners, with each examiner handling exactly one case. EMILY M MORGAN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. This distribution indicates that there is no concentration of work with any single examiner.

The 4 pending office actions are also spread across 4 distinct art units, meaning each action is in a different technical group. This one-to-one-to-one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units represents a highly fragmented prosecution environment. The company must manage 4 entirely separate tracks, each with its own examiner and art unit standards, for its 4 pending matters.

Practitioners should prepare for 4 unique negotiation styles, as the lack of examiner overlap prevents the application of insights from one case to another. The presence of 4 distinct art units further complicates this by introducing 4 different sets of technical guidelines. Managing this portfolio effectively requires a highly individualized strategy for each of the 4 pending office actions, with EMILY M MORGAN being one of the 4 examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORGAN, EMILY M 1 35.5% +33.0%
SULLIVAN, DEBRA M 1 78.4% +17.2%
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 1 59.0% +23.3%
SAETHER, FLEMMING 1 65.1% +27.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19020298 Adjustable Closure Bumper Including Locking Nut MORGAN, EMILY M 56d
18746082 LOCKBOLT INSTALLATION SWAGE TOOL SULLIVAN, DEBRA M —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18732232 Tube Clamp Configured To Be Mounted To Stud On Panel Or In Hole In Panel GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 2d overdue
18133859 SERVICEABLE STUD AND GROMMET ASSEMBLY WITH LOW INSTALLATION EFFORT AND HIGH EXTRACTION FORCE SAETHER, FLEMMING 8d
19020298 Adjustable Closure Bumper Including Locking Nut MORGAN, EMILY M 56d
18746082 LOCKBOLT INSTALLATION SWAGE TOOL SULLIVAN, DEBRA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3677 1
3725 1
3632 1
3675 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19020298 Adjustable Closure Bumper Including Locking Nut MORGAN, EMILY M 3677 §103§112 Final Rejection 56d Pending Jan 14, 2025
18746082 LOCKBOLT INSTALLATION SWAGE TOOL SULLIVAN, DEBRA M 3725 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2024
18732232 Tube Clamp Configured To Be Mounted To Stud On Panel Or In Hole In Panel GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 3632 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Jun 03, 2024
18133859 SERVICEABLE STUD AND GROMMET ASSEMBLY WITH LOW INSTALLATION EFFORT AND HIGH EXTRACTION FORCE SAETHER, FLEMMING 3675 §103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Apr 12, 2023

Managing Newfrey LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month