Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 11, 2026

NextGen Jane, Inc.

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 1 9.7% +50.0%
SCHUBERG, LAURA J 1 23.7% +37.2%
BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 1 42.9% +66.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18258714 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESERVATION OF A CERVICOVAGINAL FLUID SAMPLE MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 10d overdue
17772832 METHODS FOR THE CHARACTERIZATION OF FLUID BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 61d
18014568 FETAL TROPHOBLAST COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS SCHUBERG, LAURA J

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18258714 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESERVATION OF A CERVICOVAGINAL FLUID SAMPLE MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 10d overdue
17772832 METHODS FOR THE CHARACTERIZATION OF FLUID BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 61d
18014568 FETAL TROPHOBLAST COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS SCHUBERG, LAURA J

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 1
1631 1
1685 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18258714 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESERVATION OF A CERVICOVAGINAL FLUID SAMPLE MCCORMACK, ERIN KATHLEEN 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Jun 21, 2023
18014568 FETAL TROPHOBLAST COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS SCHUBERG, LAURA J 1631 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Jan 05, 2023
17772832 METHODS FOR THE CHARACTERIZATION OF FLUID BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 1685 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA 61d Pending Apr 28, 2022

Managing NextGen Jane, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month