1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nextiles, Inc. currently has 1 pending office action active in its patent prosecution pipeline. This matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, which means all current interactions with the patent office are channeled through a single official. This concentration allows for a focused prosecution strategy, as the applicant only needs to address the specific concerns and stylistic preferences of 1 individual. The administrative task of tracking the 1 pending office action is streamlined by this singular focus.
The prosecution is taking place within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the pending application. MCKANE, ELIZABETH L is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, currently managing the 1 pending office action. Because this examiner is responsible for the 1 pending action, their specific feedback and prior art searches will be the determining factors for the success of this filing. There are no other examiners or art units currently involved in the company's pending workload.
The presence of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner suggests a targeted approach to intellectual property. Practitioners can concentrate their efforts on the 1 distinct art unit where the case is lodged. MCKANE, ELIZABETH L holds the 1 pending office action, making this examiner the central figure in the company's current patent office interactions. This focused environment minimizes the risk of conflicting requirements from different examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCKANE, ELIZABETH L | 1 | 64.1% | +26.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18383325 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC BODY MEASUREMENTS | MCKANE, ELIZABETH L | 78d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3991 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18383325 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC BODY MEASUREMENTS | MCKANE, ELIZABETH L | 3991 | Other | Final Rejection | 78d overdue | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNextiles, Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Elizabeth L Mckane has the most, with 1 of Nextiles, Inc.'s pending office actions.
