Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nfinium Vascular Technologies, LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Nfinium Vascular Technologies, LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution is confined to a single distinct art unit, reflecting a specialized focus for the company's medical technology. The presence of a sole distinct examiner indicates a centralized review process for the company's current patent applications, which simplifies the coordination required for legal representatives.

RWEGO, KANKINDI is the busiest examiner, responsible for the 1 pending office action. Because the busiest examiner pending count is equal to the total number of pending actions, the company's immediate patenting success depends on the specific feedback from this examiner. This concentration in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector allows for a highly targeted response to the examiner's findings. Understanding the examiner's typical approach to vascular technology claims will be essential for the company to successfully navigate this pending action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RWEGO, KANKINDI 1 74.9% +33.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19067593 TEMPORARY VASCULAR SCAFFOLD AND SCORING DEVICE RWEGO, KANKINDI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19067593 TEMPORARY VASCULAR SCAFFOLD AND SCORING DEVICE RWEGO, KANKINDI 3771 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2025

Managing Nfinium Vascular Technologies, LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month