Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ningbo Kaideli Electric Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's current interactions involve a single distinct examiner and a sole distinct art unit, indicating a very specific area of patent examination. This concentration suggests that the company is currently prioritizing a single invention or a closely related group of mechanical designs within the medical device sector. By focusing on a single art unit, the company can tailor its patent claims to meet the specific standards of that examination group.
ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With only a single pending office action total, the prosecution status is entirely dependent on the proceedings managed by this specific examiner. For the company, this means that the success of their current patent application hinges on successfully addressing the specific requirements and objections raised by this individual official. The prosecution strategy must be finely tuned to the feedback provided by this sole examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S | 1 | 74.1% | +24.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18434878 | ELECTRIC GRINDER | ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S | 14d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18434878 | ELECTRIC GRINDER | ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3725 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18434878 | ELECTRIC GRINDER | ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S | 3725 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Feb 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial