Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ningbo Seago Electric Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, HARRIOTT, JAVAUN LAMAR, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 busiest examiner pending action. The portfolio is currently confined to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the pending application.
Since there is only 1 pending office action, the prosecution progress for the company is entirely dependent on the review conducted by HARRIOTT, JAVAUN LAMAR. This singular point of contact allows for a direct prosecution path but offers no comparative data from other examiners within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The applicant can focus its efforts on the specific preferences of this 1 distinct examiner.
The concentration of the portfolio within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology is specialized. With 1 busiest examiner pending action to manage, the company's legal team can dedicate its attention to the specific prior art and legal issues raised by HARRIOTT, JAVAUN LAMAR. This streamlined approach is efficient for managing a single active matter but places high importance on the outcome of this specific office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARRIOTT, JAVAUN LAMAR | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18430724 | OPERATING METHOD OF WATER FLOSSER AND WATER FLOSSER | HARRIOTT, JAVAUN LAMAR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3785 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18430724 | OPERATING METHOD OF WATER FLOSSER AND WATER FLOSSER | HARRIOTT, JAVAUN LAMAR | 3785 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNingbo Seago Electric Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Javaun Lamar Harriott has the most, with 1 of Ningbo Seago Electric Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
