Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nintex UK Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D, who is also identified as the busiest examiner for the company. The concentration of the entire pending workload under 1 distinct examiner means that the outcome of the current prosecution depends entirely on the interactions with this specific individual. This creates a focused prosecution environment where the company can dedicate its resources to addressing the specific requirements of a single examiner.
The portfolio is also limited to 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specialized technical focus for the pending application. With 1 pending office action being managed by CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D, there is no diversification across different art units or examiners at this time. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy for Nintex UK Ltd. is currently unified. The single pending office action represents the totality of the company's active engagement with the patent office, requiring a precise response to the specific examiner assigned to this 1 distinct art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D | 1 | 65.2% | +11.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18225549 | Workflow As A Service | CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D | 127d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3992 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18225549 | Workflow As A Service | CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D | 3992 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | 127d overdue | Pending | Jul 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial