Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nobl9 Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action represents the entire active workload for the company's patent portfolio. The focus on this specific technology area indicates the primary field of innovation currently being pursued by the entity.
The prosecution is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This means that all current patent office interactions are funneled through a single administrative channel. There is no diversification of examiners or art units, which simplifies the communication process but also means that the portfolio's immediate success is tied to a single examiner's perspective.
NEAL, ALLISON MICHELLE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is responsible for the full volume of the company's current prosecution. Practitioners will interact exclusively with NEAL, ALLISON MICHELLE for all matters currently awaiting a response from the office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEAL, ALLISON MICHELLE | 1 | 19.5% | +27.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18129281 | SERVICE LEVEL INDICATOR ANALYZER (SLI ANALYZER) | NEAL, ALLISON MICHELLE | 117d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18129281 | SERVICE LEVEL INDICATOR ANALYZER (SLI ANALYZER) | NEAL, ALLISON MICHELLE | 117d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18129281 | SERVICE LEVEL INDICATOR ANALYZER (SLI ANALYZER) | NEAL, ALLISON MICHELLE | 3625 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 117d overdue | Pending | Mar 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial