Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The Norwegian Defence Research Establishment has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution is currently highly focused, involving only 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. This singular point of contact simplifies the administrative tracking of the portfolio and suggests that the company's active intellectual property is concentrated in a specific technical niche. The use of a single art unit indicates that the subject matter is being evaluated against a consistent set of departmental standards.
Examiner DIZON, EDWARD ANDREW IZON is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. Because this official holds the entirety of the pending workload, the outcome of the current prosecution depends entirely on this specific individual's interpretation of the art unit's guidelines. Practitioners should focus on the specific historical tendencies of this examiner to navigate the active case. This centralized prosecution environment allows for a direct and focused dialogue with the patent office, as there are no other active examiners to coordinate with for the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIZON, EDWARD ANDREW IZON | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18726553 | Navigation Aiding Method and Apparatus | DIZON, EDWARD ANDREW IZON | 91d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18726553 | Navigation Aiding Method and Apparatus | DIZON, EDWARD ANDREW IZON | 3663 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 91d overdue | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial