Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Norwegian University of Life Sciences currently has 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated prosecution effort. The presence of 1 pending action suggests that the company's current patent strategy is focused on a specific technical advancement rather than a large-scale filing campaign. This singular focus allows the applicant to concentrate its resources on resolving the issues raised in this one case.

The entirety of the pending workload is located within 1 distinct art unit, which centralizes the company's interactions with the patent office. REGLAS, GEORGIANA C serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because this examiner is responsible for the assigned matter, they manage the total volume of the company's current office action responses. This arrangement means that the success of the current prosecution cycle depends entirely on the specific feedback and requirements issued by this single examiner in the pending application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
REGLAS, GEORGIANA C 1 37.7% +36.1%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18270538 METHOD OF CULTURE REGLAS, GEORGIANA C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1651 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18270538 METHOD OF CULTURE REGLAS, GEORGIANA C 1651 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 30, 2023

Managing Norwegian University of Life Sciences's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month