Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nota Inc.

Technology area: Computing & Software

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nota Inc. has 8 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The matters involve 7 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units, indicating distribution across several prosecution channels with one additional matter beyond the examiner and art-unit counts.

LEE, WILLIAM MICHAEL is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. The limited concentration suggests that most work is spread among other examiner relationships, requiring coordinated docket management and consistent treatment of recurring software claim issues.

Because the examiner and art-unit counts are equal, the record does not identify a shared art unit handled by multiple listed examiners. Counsel can therefore organize review around individual examiner and unit assignments while comparing related claim language across matters.

The busiest examiner’s multiple matters may offer an opportunity to align response strategy where the claim themes overlap. Other matters should remain tailored to their own examination records and cited references.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§101 + other2 (25%)
§103 only4 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
62% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
12% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, WILLIAM MICHAEL 2 — —
SOFRONIOU, MICHAEL MARIO 1 100.0% +0.0%
WALSH, EMMETT K 1 52.5% +20.1%
ANNIS, PETER THOMAS 1 — —
WERNER, MARSHALL L 1 65.8% +41.3%
BOSTWICK, SIDNEY VINCENT 1 51.6% +37.3%
GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 1 33.3% +66.7%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18809217 METHOD OF SETTING REGION OF INTEREST IN IMAGE FOR COLLECTING ROAD TRAFFIC INDEXES SOFRONIOU, MICHAEL MARIO —
18491294 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED MODEL BASED ON DEVICE AWARENESS ANNIS, PETER THOMAS —
18463184 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING MODEL FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING WITH LAYER PRUNING WERNER, MARSHALL L —
18454466 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING TRANSFER LEARNING MODEL BASED ON CONVERGENCE OF MODEL COMPRESSION AND TRANSFER LEARNING LEE, WILLIAM MICHAEL —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17842611 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RETRAINING COMPRESSED MODEL USING VARIANCE EQUALIZATION GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 17d overdue
18395030 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED MODEL WALSH, EMMETT K —
18463184 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING MODEL FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING WITH LAYER PRUNING WERNER, MARSHALL L —
18056644 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INFORMATION FLOW BASED AUTOMATIC NEURAL NETWORK COMPRESSION THAT PRESERVES THE MODEL ACCURACY BOSTWICK, SIDNEY VINCENT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2145 2
2661 1
3626 1
4100 1
2125 1
2124 1
2121 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18809217 METHOD OF SETTING REGION OF INTEREST IN IMAGE FOR COLLECTING ROAD TRAFFIC INDEXES SOFRONIOU, MICHAEL MARIO 2661 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 19, 2024
18395030 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED MODEL WALSH, EMMETT K 3626 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 22, 2023
18491294 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED MODEL BASED ON DEVICE AWARENESS ANNIS, PETER THOMAS 4100 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2023
18463184 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING MODEL FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING WITH LAYER PRUNING WERNER, MARSHALL L 2125 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 07, 2023
18454466 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING TRANSFER LEARNING MODEL BASED ON CONVERGENCE OF MODEL COMPRESSION AND TRANSFER LEARNING LEE, WILLIAM MICHAEL 2145 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 23, 2023
18163220 METHOD OF PROVIDING NEURAL NETWORK MODEL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING THE SAME LEE, WILLIAM MICHAEL 2145 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 01, 2023
18056644 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INFORMATION FLOW BASED AUTOMATIC NEURAL NETWORK COMPRESSION THAT PRESERVES THE MODEL ACCURACY BOSTWICK, SIDNEY VINCENT 2124 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 17, 2022
17842611 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RETRAINING COMPRESSED MODEL USING VARIANCE EQUALIZATION GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 2121 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Jun 16, 2022

Managing Nota Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Nota Inc. have?

Nota Inc. has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Nota Inc. applications?

William Michael Lee has the most, with 2 of Nota Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Nota Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month