Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nota Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nota Inc. manages 4 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These 4 actions are distributed across 4 distinct examiners, ensuring that no examiner is currently reviewing more than one pending application. The portfolio is spread across 4 distinct art units, matching the number of examiners and pending actions. This one-to-one-to-one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units suggests a range of technical subject matter within the computing sector.

SOFRONIOU, MICHAEL MARIO is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Since the 4 distinct examiners each handle an equal portion of the workload, the company faces a broad front of examination. Practitioners must be prepared to tailor their arguments to 4 different art units, as the lack of examiner overlap prevents the use of a single consolidated strategy. The distribution of 4 pending office actions across such a variety of examiners and units highlights the need for a versatile approach to patent prosecution in this technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (25%)
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
50% of docket
1
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SOFRONIOU, MICHAEL MARIO 1 100.0% +0.0%
ANNIS, PETER THOMAS 1 — —
WERNER, MARSHALL L 1 66.1% +40.7%
GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 1 40.0% +66.7%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18809217 METHOD OF SETTING REGION OF INTEREST IN IMAGE FOR COLLECTING ROAD TRAFFIC INDEXES SOFRONIOU, MICHAEL MARIO —
18491294 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED MODEL BASED ON DEVICE AWARENESS ANNIS, PETER THOMAS —
18463184 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING MODEL FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING WITH LAYER PRUNING WERNER, MARSHALL L —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17842611 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RETRAINING COMPRESSED MODEL USING VARIANCE EQUALIZATION GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 17d overdue
18463184 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING MODEL FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING WITH LAYER PRUNING WERNER, MARSHALL L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2661 1
4100 1
2125 1
2121 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18809217 METHOD OF SETTING REGION OF INTEREST IN IMAGE FOR COLLECTING ROAD TRAFFIC INDEXES SOFRONIOU, MICHAEL MARIO 2661 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 19, 2024
18491294 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED MODEL BASED ON DEVICE AWARENESS ANNIS, PETER THOMAS 4100 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2023
18463184 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPRESSING MODEL FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING WITH LAYER PRUNING WERNER, MARSHALL L 2125 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 07, 2023
17842611 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RETRAINING COMPRESSED MODEL USING VARIANCE EQUALIZATION GRUSZKA, DANIEL PATRICK 2121 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Jun 16, 2022

Managing Nota Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month