Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Novaria Holdings, LLC currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This workload is assigned to a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. The concentration of the portfolio indicates a specific focus on mechanical or logistical systems. This singular focus allows for a streamlined prosecution strategy that is not complicated by multiple examiner interactions. The company can dedicate its resources to resolving the specific issues raised in this single pending matter.
WONG, JOCK M is the busiest examiner for this entity, overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's current pending matters. Prosecution strategy should be customized to the specific requirements of this examiner within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area. With a distinct examiner involved, the company can maintain a highly consistent approach to its current patent applications. Practitioners should evaluate the examiner's typical response times and requirements to optimize the prosecution timeline.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WONG, JOCK M | 1 | 36.0% | +50.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17161470 | ONE-PIECE NUT CAP | WONG, JOCK M | 78d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17161470 | ONE-PIECE NUT CAP | WONG, JOCK M | 78d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17161470 | ONE-PIECE NUT CAP | WONG, JOCK M | 3675 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 78d overdue | Pending | Jan 28, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial