Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ntd Labs S L U currently manages 1 pending office action. This single active matter is assigned to a single distinct examiner, AUDET, MAURY A. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which may reflect a specific administrative status or a very early stage in the filing process where an art unit has not been finalized or recorded in the primary data field. This singular focus means that the company's immediate success in the patent office is entirely dependent on the feedback and requirements of this specific examiner. Practitioners should note that the portfolio's current activity is concentrated on this one pending matter.
AUDET, MAURY A is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding the 1 pending office action currently on record. Because the distinct examiners count is 1, the company's immediate patent strategy appears narrow in scope. This alignment between the busiest examiner and the total pending actions indicates that the outcome of this specific interaction will define the company's short-term success. The lack of recorded art units suggests a unique procedural situation for this filing. Consequently, the prosecution experience is highly centralized, requiring a deep understanding of the specific preferences of AUDET, MAURY A as the sole examiner managing the company's pending work.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDET, MAURY A | 1 | 50.1% | +23.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18701834 | COMBINED USE OF IMIQUIMOD AND A CASEIN HYDROLYSATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CONDYLOMA | AUDET, MAURY A | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18701834 | COMBINED USE OF IMIQUIMOD AND A CASEIN HYDROLYSATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CONDYLOMA | AUDET, MAURY A | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial