Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ntopology Inc. operates within the Computing & Software technology area and currently has 1 pending office action. This single matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly concentrated prosecution effort where all current activity is focused on a specific individual and a technical group at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is HAO, YI. This examiner is currently overseeing the pending office action for the company. As the only examiner involved, this individual's review is the primary factor in the company's current patent office interactions. The fact that the active matter is contained within its specific art unit suggests a very narrow technical focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts.
For a practitioner, this means that the entire current prosecution landscape for Ntopology Inc. is defined by a single examiner in the Computing & Software sector. The outcome of the active case will depend entirely on the interaction with HAO, YI. This focus allows for a very direct and specialized prosecution strategy without the need to coordinate across multiple examiners or art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAO, YI | 1 | 34.0% | +46.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2187 | 1 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial