Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nunhems B.V.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

11 pending office actions • 2 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nunhems B.V. is currently managing 11 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio shows technical concentration, as all 11 actions are situated within only 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's patent filings are clustered around specific biological innovations, leading to frequent interactions with a limited number of examination groups. Prosecution is handled by 9 distinct examiners, which is a high number given the focus on only 2 art units.

This count of 9 examiners is lower than the 11 pending office actions currently active in the portfolio. KEOGH, MATTHEW R is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending office actions under review. Since these 2 actions are part of a total of 11, the influence of any single examiner is moderate. The concentration in 2 art units means that the company's overall prosecution strategy likely benefits from an understanding of the specific policies within those two USPTO departments.

With 9 distinct examiners involved, the company still faces a variety of individual perspectives, but the narrow art unit focus provides a consistent structural environment. This combination of 11 pending office actions and 9 distinct examiners requires a coordinated effort to ensure consistency across the portfolio. The role of KEOGH, MATTHEW R as the busiest examiner involves 2 pending office actions, which is a smaller count than the 11 total pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (36%)
1
Medium (9%)
5
Easy (45%)
1
Unknown (9%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only5 (45%)
Double-patenting + other1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)
No statute on record1 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
82% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
18% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KEOGH, MATTHEW R 2 78.5% +14.4%
KUBELIK, ANNE R 2 75.8% -1.1%
FAN, WEIHUA 1 83.3% +12.7%
MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 1 89.2% +5.8%
KALLIS, RUSSELL 1 86.9% +7.9%
RADOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR 1 80.8% +6.3%
KOVALENKO, MYKOLA V 1 69.6% +25.5%
KINGDON, CATHY 1 80.3% +2.6%
SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON 1 70.0% +69.2%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18072334 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 09185 LTL KINGDON, CATHY 32d overdue
18798285 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00333 TOP MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 15d
18605199 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32117 WMW KALLIS, RUSSELL 43d

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18823297 CUCUMBER VARIETY NUN 97080 CUL FAN, WEIHUA 19d
18287713 INTROGRESSION OF TOLCNDV-ES RESISTANCE CONFERRING QTLS IN CUCUMIS SATIVUS PLANTS RADOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR 35d
19000272 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32206 WMW KUBELIK, ANNE R —
19000375 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32203 WMW KUBELIK, ANNE R —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18823297 CUCUMBER VARIETY NUN 97080 CUL FAN, WEIHUA 19d
19000569 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32202 WMW KEOGH, MATTHEW R —
19000570 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00343 TOP KEOGH, MATTHEW R —
18342484 SPECIES OF TOBAMOVIRUS KOVALENKO, MYKOLA V —
17924321 TOMATO PLANTS HAVING SUPPRESSED MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1663 7
1662 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19000569 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32202 WMW KEOGH, MATTHEW R 1663 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
19000570 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00343 TOP KEOGH, MATTHEW R 1663 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 23, 2024
19000272 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32206 WMW KUBELIK, ANNE R — §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
19000375 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32203 WMW KUBELIK, ANNE R — §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
18823297 CUCUMBER VARIETY NUN 97080 CUL FAN, WEIHUA 1663 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Sep 03, 2024
18798285 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00333 TOP MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 1663 §112 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Aug 08, 2024
18605199 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32117 WMW KALLIS, RUSSELL 1663 §112 Non-Final OA 43d Pending Mar 14, 2024
18287713 INTROGRESSION OF TOLCNDV-ES RESISTANCE CONFERRING QTLS IN CUCUMIS SATIVUS PLANTS RADOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR 1662 §102§112 Final Rejection 35d Pending Oct 20, 2023
18342484 SPECIES OF TOBAMOVIRUS KOVALENKO, MYKOLA V 1662 Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 27, 2023
18072334 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 09185 LTL KINGDON, CATHY 1663 §102§112DP Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending Nov 30, 2022
17924321 TOMATO PLANTS HAVING SUPPRESSED MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON 1663 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 09, 2022

Managing Nunhems B.V.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Nunhems B.V. have?

Nunhems B.V. has 11 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 9 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Nunhems B.V. applications?

Matthew R Keogh has the most, with 2 of Nunhems B.V.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Nunhems B.V.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month