Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nunhems Netherlands B V

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Nunhems Netherlands B V has 3 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The docket spans 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, giving the matters a more focused assignment structure than a one-examiner-per-matter pattern.

CALAMITA, HEATHER is the busiest listed examiner, with 2 pending matters. That examiner handles most of the listed activity, so a consistent review of claim strategy and outstanding issues may have value across the affected applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
3
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CALAMITA, HEATHER 2 38.1% +9.6%
SHARMA, SANTOSH 1 72.8% +29.8%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19383106 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 09208 LTL SHARMA, SANTOSH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1684 2
1663 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19383106 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 09208 LTL SHARMA, SANTOSH 1663 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 07, 2025
19319025 ONION VARIETY NUN 02006 ONS CALAMITA, HEATHER 1684 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2025
19066857 ONION VARIETY NUN 03019 ONS CALAMITA, HEATHER 1684 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2025

Managing Nunhems Netherlands B V's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Nunhems Netherlands B V have?

Nunhems Netherlands B V has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Nunhems Netherlands B V applications?

Heather Calamita has the most, with 2 of Nunhems Netherlands B V's pending office actions.

What technology area are Nunhems Netherlands B V's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month