Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nutri-Gentix Limited has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical area of interest within the biotechnology sector. Having only 1 pending office action allows the company to focus its resources on a single technical challenge, ensuring a thorough and targeted response to the examiner's findings.
The busiest examiner is PACKARD, BENJAMIN J, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action, the portfolio's activity is concentrated. This allows for a focused approach to the examination process in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit and the preferences of PACKARD, BENJAMIN J. Since the entire active portfolio consists of 1 pending office action, the outcome of this case is the primary focus of the company's current prosecution efforts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACKARD, BENJAMIN J | 1 | 66.7% | +15.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18709380 | NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITIONS | PACKARD, BENJAMIN J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18709380 | NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITIONS | PACKARD, BENJAMIN J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18709380 | NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITIONS | PACKARD, BENJAMIN J | 1612 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial