Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 6 (86%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLSON, ANDREA STEFFEL | 2 | 62.3% | -12.2% |
| FORTUNA, JOSE A | 1 | 79.5% | +9.7% |
| SILVERMAN, JANICE Y | 1 | 36.5% | +53.3% |
| GREENE, IVAN A | 1 | 18.7% | +6.2% |
| MCINTOSH III, TRAVISS C | 1 | 73.2% | +14.1% |
| KUMAR, PREETI | 1 | 31.3% | +44.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18576406 | CATIONIC GLUCAN ESTER DERIVATIVES | GREENE, IVAN A | 70d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18495216 | NONWOVEN GLUCAN WEBS | MCINTOSH III, TRAVISS C | 14d |
| 18695603 | OPTIMIZED WATER LINE DELIVERY OF MICROBES | SILVERMAN, JANICE Y | 70d |
| 18008213 | POLY ALPHA-1,6-GLUCAN ESTERS AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAME | KUMAR, PREETI | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1693 | 2 |
| 1748 | 1 |
| 1792 | 1 |
| 1619 | 1 |
| 1761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18727396 | PAPER COATING COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING RUBBER AND INSOLUBLE ALPHA-GLUCAN | FORTUNA, JOSE A | 1748 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 09, 2024 |
| 18704557 | COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING CATIONIC ALPHA-1,6-GLUCAN DERIVATIVE AND ALPHA-1,3-GLUCAN | OLSON, ANDREA STEFFEL | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 25, 2024 |
| 18695603 | OPTIMIZED WATER LINE DELIVERY OF MICROBES | SILVERMAN, JANICE Y | 1792 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 70d | Pending | Mar 26, 2024 |
| 18604878 | ALPHA-1,3-GLUCAN GRAFT COPOLYMERS | OLSON, ANDREA STEFFEL | 1693 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 14, 2024 |
| 18576406 | CATIONIC GLUCAN ESTER DERIVATIVES | GREENE, IVAN A | 1619 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 70d | Pending | Jan 04, 2024 |
| 18495216 | NONWOVEN GLUCAN WEBS | MCINTOSH III, TRAVISS C | 1693 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
| 18008213 | POLY ALPHA-1,6-GLUCAN ESTERS AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAME | KUMAR, PREETI | 1761 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 05, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial