Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Nyse Group Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action represents the current active prosecution efforts for the company. The work is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specific technical focus for the underlying invention. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, meaning that current feedback from the USPTO originates from 1 source.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WARDEN, MICHAEL J, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the busiest examiner pending count is 1, this individual is the 1 examiner for the company applications. For a practitioner, this centralization means that the prosecution strategy can be tailored to the specific examiner. The outcome of the 1 pending office action will define the immediate progress of the portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 1 | 25.4% | +21.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14574930 | LARGE LIQUIDITY SEEKING TRADING PLATFORM | WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14574930 | LARGE LIQUIDITY SEEKING TRADING PLATFORM | WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3694 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14574930 | LARGE LIQUIDITY SEEKING TRADING PLATFORM | WARDEN, MICHAEL J | 3694 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Dec 18, 2014 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial