Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

O2 Partners LLC

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

O2 Partners LLC has 4 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. Stella Kim Yi is the busiest examiner, overseeing 2 pending actions. The remaining actions are split between the other examiners.

The distribution across 2 art units suggests the company is pursuing multiple mechanical or medical sub-specialties. Practitioners should note that Yi's 2 pending actions make her a primary point of contact for the portfolio's current prosecution. With 4 pending office actions and 3 examiners, the company must manage several individual examiner relationships. The focus on 2 distinct art units indicates a concentrated technical scope despite the involvement of multiple examiners. Successfully resolving the 4 pending actions will require navigating the specific requirements of both art units. The presence of 3 examiners for 4 actions ensures that the workload is not overly concentrated on a single official.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
YI, STELLA KIM 2 71.0% +28.5%
LYNCH, MEGAN E 1 38.2% +40.0%
PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 1 59.0% +32.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18975860 Fiber-Based Shoe Insoles and Methods of Manufacturing the Same LYNCH, MEGAN E 28d
18298877 FIBER-FOAM SHOE INSOLES, AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 33d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18975860 Fiber-Based Shoe Insoles and Methods of Manufacturing the Same LYNCH, MEGAN E 28d
18298877 FIBER-FOAM SHOE INSOLES, AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 33d
18254640 BIODEGRADABLE, INDUSTRIALLY COMPOSTABLE, AND RECYCLABLE INJECTION MOLDED MICROCELLULAR FLEXIBLE FOAMS YI, STELLA KIM 56d
19018162 Biodegradable, Industrially Compostable, and Recyclable Injection Molded Microcellular Flexible Foams YI, STELLA KIM —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 2
1742 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19018162 Biodegradable, Industrially Compostable, and Recyclable Injection Molded Microcellular Flexible Foams YI, STELLA KIM — §102 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 13, 2025
18975860 Fiber-Based Shoe Insoles and Methods of Manufacturing the Same LYNCH, MEGAN E 3732 §102§103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Dec 10, 2024
18254640 BIODEGRADABLE, INDUSTRIALLY COMPOSTABLE, AND RECYCLABLE INJECTION MOLDED MICROCELLULAR FLEXIBLE FOAMS YI, STELLA KIM 1742 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending May 26, 2023
18298877 FIBER-FOAM SHOE INSOLES, AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 3732 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Apr 11, 2023

Managing O2 Partners LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month