Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOROWSKI, MICHAEL | 1 | 17.6% | +37.5% |
| RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 1 | 24.8% | +18.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18474288 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING A MEDICAL SESSION REPORT AND A METHOD THEREOF | WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 46d overdue |
| 18986687 | Dynamic Appointment Scheduling | BOROWSKI, MICHAEL | 8d overdue |
| 18491876 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO ENHANCE THE CONTINUITY OF CARE FOR A PATIENT | RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN | 3d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18474288 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING A MEDICAL SESSION REPORT AND A METHOD THEREOF | WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 46d overdue |
| 18986687 | Dynamic Appointment Scheduling | BOROWSKI, MICHAEL | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 1 |
| 3684 | 1 |
| 3687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18986687 | Dynamic Appointment Scheduling | BOROWSKI, MICHAEL | 3624 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Dec 18, 2024 |
| 18491876 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO ENHANCE THE CONTINUITY OF CARE FOR A PATIENT | RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN | 3684 | §103 | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Oct 23, 2023 |
| 18474288 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING A MEDICAL SESSION REPORT AND A METHOD THEREOF | WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 3687 | §103 | Final Rejection | 46d overdue | Pending | Sep 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial