Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Octane Innovation Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner within a distinct art unit, indicating a point of contact for the company's current patent prosecution. This concentration reflects a focused approach to securing intellectual property in the medical device field. The company's immediate patenting goals are centered on this specific application and the feedback provided by the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is REDDY, SUNITA, who holds the pending office action. This represents the entirety of the company's pending workload at the USPTO. With only the pending office action, the portfolio's immediate success is dependent on navigating the specific examination criteria of this examiner. Practitioners should analyze the 1 pending office action to ensure that the company's medical device innovations are adequately protected according to the standards of the involved art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDDY, SUNITA | 1 | 67.4% | +61.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18704244 | PERSONALIZED BIOELECTROMAGNETIC THERAPEUTICS | REDDY, SUNITA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18704244 | PERSONALIZED BIOELECTROMAGNETIC THERAPEUTICS | REDDY, SUNITA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18704244 | PERSONALIZED BIOELECTROMAGNETIC THERAPEUTICS | REDDY, SUNITA | 3791 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialOctane Innovation Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Sunita Reddy has the most, with 1 of Octane Innovation Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
