Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Octoml Inc.

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Octoml Inc. has 3 pending office actions in Computing & Software. These matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. GARNER, CASEY R is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending office actions. The distribution of the 3 pending office actions across 2 distinct art units indicates that the applications are technically related.

The portfolio features 3 pending office actions being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners, with the busiest examiner handling 2 pending office actions. This concentration makes GARNER, CASEY R a primary figure for the majority of the company's pending cases. Because the actions are located in 2 distinct art units, the company faces a relatively focused set of technical challenges. This limited number of art units suggests that the Computing & Software applications are closely aligned.

Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of the busiest examiner given his workload. With only 2 distinct examiners involved, the company can maintain a high degree of consistency in its prosecution approach. The 2 distinct art units involved will define the technical boundaries for these 3 pending office actions. A coordinated strategy is essential to manage the feedback from the two officials assigned to the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GARNER, CASEY R 2 71.2% +17.1%
NGUYEN, CHAU T 1 67.7% +31.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18647339 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL INSTRUMENTATION HOOKS GARNER, CASEY R —
18596437 AUTOMATIC ADAPTATION FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS GARNER, CASEY R —
18538972 OPTIMIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS NGUYEN, CHAU T —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18647339 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL INSTRUMENTATION HOOKS GARNER, CASEY R —
18596437 AUTOMATIC ADAPTATION FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS GARNER, CASEY R —
18538972 OPTIMIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS NGUYEN, CHAU T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2123 2
2145 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18647339 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL INSTRUMENTATION HOOKS GARNER, CASEY R 2123 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 26, 2024
18596437 AUTOMATIC ADAPTATION FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS GARNER, CASEY R 2123 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 05, 2024
18538972 OPTIMIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS NGUYEN, CHAU T 2145 §101§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2023

Managing Octoml Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Octoml Inc. have?

Octoml Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Octoml Inc. applications?

Casey R Garner has the most, with 2 of Octoml Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Octoml Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month