Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Oetiker Ny Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ensuring a focused prosecution path for this specific application. The examiner responsible for this matter is KEE, FANNIE C, who is also the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action.
The portfolio is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specialized focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts. Because there is only a single pending office action, the entire prosecution profile of the company rests on this individual interaction. The workload is concentrated, as KEE, FANNIE C manages the totality of the company's current pending actions.
This singular focus allows for a direct and streamlined communication channel during the examination process. Practitioners should note that the alignment of 1 pending office action with a single examiner and art unit provides a very specific environment for prosecution. The outcome of the company's current efforts in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector depends entirely on this individual review.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEE, FANNIE C | 1 | 69.9% | +29.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18906456 | FLUID CONNECTION ASSEMBLY | KEE, FANNIE C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18906456 | FLUID CONNECTION ASSEMBLY | KEE, FANNIE C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3679 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18906456 | FLUID CONNECTION ASSEMBLY | KEE, FANNIE C | 3679 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial