Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ohio University

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

8 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 1 of 8 (12%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ohio University has 8 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters involve 8 examiners and 8 art units, creating a widely distributed chemistry and materials prosecution docket.

BREWER, JACK ROBERT is the busiest listed examiner, with 1 pending matter. The examiner and art-unit distribution favors matter-level preparation, supported by centralized tracking of recurring chemistry issues and consistent terminology.

Counsel should avoid assuming that an amendment or argument will transfer directly between matters. Separate examination assignments call for individual review of the record, while portfolio-level oversight can preserve alignment in disclosure and claim strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (38%)
§102 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BREWER, JACK ROBERT 1 44.4% +71.4%
HELLMAN, KRISTINA M 1 65.1% +55.5%
WHITE, SADIE 1 49.3% +31.2%
HEVEY, JOHN A 1 61.8% +19.7%
WONG, EDNA 1 58.4% -19.7%
MILLER, PRESTON JAY 1 54.2% +24.4%
BULLOCK, IN SUK C 1 51.2% +28.3%
OYER, ANDREW J 1 79.2% +16.8%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18902224 MARINE SURFACE VESSEL TRAJECTORY TRACKING CONTROL BREWER, JACK ROBERT —
18802702 Methods for Regulating Muscle Performance using Fat Specific Protein 27 (FSP27) Compositions HELLMAN, KRISTINA M —
18479916 WHEELED GROUND VEHICLE ROLLOVER PROTECTION CONTROL BY TRAJECTORY LINEARIZATION CONTROL MILLER, PRESTON JAY —
18247610 POLYMER COMPOSITES COMPRISING CARBON SOURCE MATERIALS OYER, ANDREW J —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18536709 ULTRACONDUCTIVE METAL COMPOSITE FORMS AND THE SYNTHESIS THEREOF HEVEY, JOHN A 128d overdue
18902224 MARINE SURFACE VESSEL TRAJECTORY TRACKING CONTROL BREWER, JACK ROBERT —
18802702 Methods for Regulating Muscle Performance using Fat Specific Protein 27 (FSP27) Compositions HELLMAN, KRISTINA M —
18650924 Electrochemical UV Sensor Using Carbon Quantum Dots WHITE, SADIE —
18479916 WHEELED GROUND VEHICLE ROLLOVER PROTECTION CONTROL BY TRAJECTORY LINEARIZATION CONTROL MILLER, PRESTON JAY —
18227542 SHAPE MEMORY POLY(ß-HYDROXYTHIOETHER) FOAMS RAPIDLY PRODUCED FROM MULTIFUNCTIONAL EPOXIDES AND THIOLS BULLOCK, IN SUK C —
18247610 POLYMER COMPOSITES COMPRISING CARBON SOURCE MATERIALS OYER, ANDREW J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3663 1
1654 1
1721 1
1735 1
1795 1
3661 1
1772 1
1767 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18902224 MARINE SURFACE VESSEL TRAJECTORY TRACKING CONTROL BREWER, JACK ROBERT 3663 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18802702 Methods for Regulating Muscle Performance using Fat Specific Protein 27 (FSP27) Compositions HELLMAN, KRISTINA M 1654 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 13, 2024
18650924 Electrochemical UV Sensor Using Carbon Quantum Dots WHITE, SADIE 1721 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18536709 ULTRACONDUCTIVE METAL COMPOSITE FORMS AND THE SYNTHESIS THEREOF HEVEY, JOHN A 1735 §103 Final Rejection 128d overdue AI Ready Dec 12, 2023
18536930 MODULAR ELECTROCATALYTICAL PROCESSING FOR SIMULTANEOUS CONVERSION OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND WET SHALE GAS WONG, EDNA 1795 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2023
18479916 WHEELED GROUND VEHICLE ROLLOVER PROTECTION CONTROL BY TRAJECTORY LINEARIZATION CONTROL MILLER, PRESTON JAY 3661 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 03, 2023
18227542 SHAPE MEMORY POLY(ß-HYDROXYTHIOETHER) FOAMS RAPIDLY PRODUCED FROM MULTIFUNCTIONAL EPOXIDES AND THIOLS BULLOCK, IN SUK C 1772 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 28, 2023
18247610 POLYMER COMPOSITES COMPRISING CARBON SOURCE MATERIALS OYER, ANDREW J 1767 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 31, 2023

Managing Ohio University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ohio University have?

Ohio University has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 8 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ohio University applications?

Jack Robert Brewer has the most, with 1 of Ohio University's pending office actions.

What technology area are Ohio University's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month