Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Oil Can Rod LLC is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The examiner, ADAMOS, THEODORE V, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total current prosecution activity for the company, indicating a highly focused technical review. The concentration in 1 art unit indicates a specific technical focus for the pending application within the mechanical systems field.
With only 1 pending office action, the company's current engagement with the patent office is limited to a single point of contact. This allows for a direct and singular prosecution strategy under the review of ADAMOS, THEODORE V. The focus on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area indicates that the company's current intellectual property goals are tied to this specific technical domain. Because the action is located in 1 distinct art unit, the company must navigate the specific examination criteria of that specialized group. This 1 pending action defines the present state of the company's patent portfolio activity.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 1 | 55.4% | +44.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913455 | BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913455 | BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18913455 | BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 3635 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialOil Can Rod LLC has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Theodore V Adamos has the most, with 1 of Oil Can Rod LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
