Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Oncocross Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Oncocross Co. Ltd. maintains a patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company currently has 2 pending office actions. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units, reflecting a diverse range of perspectives on their applications. This distribution suggests that the company's biotechnology research is being evaluated by multiple experts within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field.

HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD is responsible for 1 of the company's current workload. The distribution across 2 distinct art units shows that the company's innovations are being reviewed by more than one specialized group at the patent office, which can lead to different examination experiences for each application.

For the practitioner, having 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units involved in 2 pending office actions requires a coordinated but flexible approach. Each application must be prosecuted according to the specific feedback from its examiner. The presence of 2 distinct art units also means that the company must be prepared to address the technical standards of different specialized divisions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector, ensuring that each case is handled with the appropriate technical focus.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1 36.3% +23.5%
RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17918977 METHOD FOR ESTIMATING TISSUE-LEVEL INFORMATION FROM CELLULAR-LEVEL INFORMATION, AND DEVICE THEREFOR RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 14d
18278887 METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY SITE BY USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18278887 METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY SITE BY USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1685 1
3684 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18278887 METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY SITE BY USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1685 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 25, 2023
17918977 METHOD FOR ESTIMATING TISSUE-LEVEL INFORMATION FROM CELLULAR-LEVEL INFORMATION, AND DEVICE THEREFOR RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 3684 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Oct 14, 2022

Managing Oncocross Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Oncocross Co. Ltd. have?

Oncocross Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Oncocross Co. Ltd. applications?

Jonathan Edward Hayes has the most, with 1 of Oncocross Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Oncocross Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month