Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Oncocross Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Oncocross Co. Ltd. is currently managing 3 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that each individual case is receiving a unique evaluation. This lack of examiner overlap suggests that the company must tailor its arguments to 3 different sets of examiner preferences and communication styles to move its applications forward.

The 3 pending office actions are situated within 2 distinct art units. This concentration in a small number of art units relative to the number of examiners implies that while the personnel differ, the technical subject matter remains focused. DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action, which confirms that the workload is evenly spread across the 3 distinct examiners.

For a practitioner, the presence of 3 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units suggests a need for diverse advocacy within a narrow technical field. The fact that the busiest examiner, DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE, holds only 1 pending office action means that no single official dominates the current prosecution landscape. This portfolio structure requires monitoring the specific tendencies of each examiner to ensure consistent results across the 2 distinct art units involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE 1 0.0% +0.0%
HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1 36.4% +20.7%
RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18285820 COMPOUND FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF KIDNEY DISEASE DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE 23d overdue
17918977 METHOD FOR ESTIMATING TISSUE-LEVEL INFORMATION FROM CELLULAR-LEVEL INFORMATION, AND DEVICE THEREFOR RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 14d
18278887 METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY SITE BY USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18278887 METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY SITE BY USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1622 1
3684 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18285820 COMPOUND FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF KIDNEY DISEASE DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE 1622 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Oct 05, 2023
18278887 METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY SITE BY USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 25, 2023
17918977 METHOD FOR ESTIMATING TISSUE-LEVEL INFORMATION FROM CELLULAR-LEVEL INFORMATION, AND DEVICE THEREFOR RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 3684 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Oct 14, 2022

Managing Oncocross Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month