Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ondosis AB has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's pending mechanical applications cover multiple technical sub-fields or are being examined by different administrative groups. The use of 2 distinct art units indicates a broader technical scope than portfolios concentrated in a single unit.
The busiest examiner, RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L, is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners each managing 1 of the 2 pending actions, the workload is evenly split. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 shows that no single examiner dominates the company's current prosecution. This distribution requires the applicant to manage two separate examination tracks, each with its own set of technical requirements and examiner preferences within the transportation and mechanical systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L | 1 | 44.8% | +16.3% |
| RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW | 1 | 73.4% | +33.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17620911 | DELIVERY DEVICE FOR DRUG PELLETS | RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17925510 | DELIVERY DEVICE FOR UNITS OF AN ORAL DOSAGE FORM | RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L | 72d overdue |
| 17620911 | DELIVERY DEVICE FOR DRUG PELLETS | RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17925510 | DELIVERY DEVICE FOR UNITS OF AN ORAL DOSAGE FORM | RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L | 3651 | §103 | Final Rejection | 72d overdue | Pending | Nov 15, 2022 |
| 17620911 | DELIVERY DEVICE FOR DRUG PELLETS | RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW | 3783 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 20, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial