Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Oneprojects Design And Innovation Ltd. is managing 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, with DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The prosecution is distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's communications technologies are being reviewed by different technical groups.
With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the prosecution strategy must account for two different examination styles. DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH handles 1 of the 2 pending actions, while another examiner handles the other, meaning no single examiner controls the entire portfolio. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the 2 pending actions may involve different sub-technologies within the Communications field. Practitioners should monitor the specific behaviors of both examiners to ensure a consistent approach across the 2 pending matters. This distribution across 2 art units requires a broader monitoring of art unit trends.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH | 1 | 67.9% | +12.5% |
| LANGHALS, RENEE C | 1 | 58.3% | +43.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18198538 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TISSUE EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION | DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH | 9d |
| 17690708 | DISPOSABLE CATHETER WITH ROTATABLE IMAGE ARRAY | LANGHALS, RENEE C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2677 | 1 |
| 3797 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18198538 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TISSUE EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION | DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH | 2677 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | May 17, 2023 |
| 17690708 | DISPOSABLE CATHETER WITH ROTATABLE IMAGE ARRAY | LANGHALS, RENEE C | 3797 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 09, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial