Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Onni Pty Ltd. maintains a company patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. Currently, the portfolio includes 1 pending office action. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner, KUCAB, JAMIE R, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. All prosecution activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit.
For a practitioner, this concentration means the company's current USPTO engagement is limited to a specific channel. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the active pipeline. Navigating the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field with 1 distinct examiner allows for a highly focused approach. However, it also means the portfolio's immediate growth depends on the resolution of the 1 busiest examiner pending action. Practitioners should tailor their strategy specifically to the tendencies of KUCAB, JAMIE R to optimize outcomes within the 1 distinct art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUCAB, JAMIE R | 1 | 67.2% | +36.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18018710 | AN INSTANT CROSS-BORDER ELECTRONIC TOKENISED GIFTING SYSTEM | KUCAB, JAMIE R | 127d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18018710 | AN INSTANT CROSS-BORDER ELECTRONIC TOKENISED GIFTING SYSTEM | KUCAB, JAMIE R | 127d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18018710 | AN INSTANT CROSS-BORDER ELECTRONIC TOKENISED GIFTING SYSTEM | KUCAB, JAMIE R | 3699 | §101§102§112 | Non-Final OA | 127d overdue | Pending | Jan 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial