Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ontario Institute For Cancer Research (Oicr)

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Ontario Institute For Cancer Research (Oicr) is currently prosecuting patent applications in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio features 4 pending office actions, indicating active development of its intellectual property. These actions are situated within 3 distinct art units, which shows that the institute's biological and pharmaceutical innovations are being reviewed by 3 different specialized groups of examiners. This requires the management of technical dialogues across multiple specialized divisions within the patent office.

The prosecution involves 4 distinct examiners, meaning that every pending office action is being reviewed by a different person. ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently responsible for 1 pending office action. Since the number of examiners equals the number of pending actions, the workload is evenly distributed across the assigned staff. Practitioners should be prepared to address the specific technical requirements of 3 different art units while managing the individual expectations of the 4 different examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
1
Medium (25%)
2
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL 1 35.5% +31.2%
NESTOR, DONNA MICHELLE 1 56.6% +44.2%
RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW 1 64.8% +37.0%
GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 1 45.8% +40.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18838651 ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF BAX AND/OR BAK, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17612695 PAN-CANCER TRANSCRIPTIONAL SIGNATURE GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 366d overdue
18838651 ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF BAX AND/OR BAK, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL —
18288219 SUBSTITUTED AMINO AZA-HETEROARYL COMPOUNDS AS INHIBITORS OF THE HAEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR KINASE 1 (HPK1) NESTOR, DONNA MICHELLE —
18288213 HALO-SUBSTITUTED AMINO PYRIDINE COMPOUNDS AS INHIBITORS OF THE HAEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR KINASE 1 (HPK1) RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1627 1
1625 1
1682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18838651 ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF BAX AND/OR BAK, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF ELENISTE, PIERRE PAUL — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 15, 2024
18288219 SUBSTITUTED AMINO AZA-HETEROARYL COMPOUNDS AS INHIBITORS OF THE HAEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR KINASE 1 (HPK1) NESTOR, DONNA MICHELLE 1627 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2023
18288213 HALO-SUBSTITUTED AMINO PYRIDINE COMPOUNDS AS INHIBITORS OF THE HAEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR KINASE 1 (HPK1) RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW 1625 DP Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2023
17612695 PAN-CANCER TRANSCRIPTIONAL SIGNATURE GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 1682 §112 Non-Final OA 366d overdue Pending Nov 19, 2021

Managing Ontario Institute For Cancer Research (Oicr)'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month