Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Op-T LLC

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Op-T LLC has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, CHESTNUT, BARRY A, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution activity is concentrated under a single examiner, representing the only active point of contact for the portfolio's pending matters.

For the practitioner, this centralization means that the success of the current prosecution cycle depends entirely on the interaction with CHESTNUT, BARRY A. There are no other pending matters to provide a broader context of how different examiners in the same field might view the company's technology. The fact that the 1 pending action is also the only action for the busiest examiner suggests that the examiner's attention is not divided across multiple cases for this specific applicant. This singular focus can be advantageous for building a consistent record, but it also means there is no diversification of risk across different art units or examiners. The practitioner must tailor the strategy specifically to the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals standards applied by this single examiner and art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHESTNUT, BARRY A 1 73.9% +6.3%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1672 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18746393 BIOACTIVE PEPTIDES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF CHESTNUT, BARRY A 1672 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2024

Managing Op-T LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Op-T LLC have?

Op-T LLC has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Op-T LLC applications?

Barry A Chestnut has the most, with 1 of Op-T LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Op-T LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month