Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Opendorse Inc. currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. The portfolio is situated in 1 distinct art unit. ZEROUAL, OMAR is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. With only 1 pending office action, the company's current engagement with the USPTO is minimal. The focus on 1 distinct art unit indicates a specific technical application within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
ZEROUAL, OMAR manages the total pending workload for the entity. This single point of contact defines the current prosecution path for the company. Practitioners can observe that having 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit eliminates the need to coordinate across different USPTO groups. ZEROUAL, OMAR is the only examiner assigned to the 1 busiest examiner pending action. The current data shows a streamlined prosecution profile with no examiner or art unit diversity. This centralized structure allows for a very specific and consistent approach to the company's current patent matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZEROUAL, OMAR | 1 | 33.5% | +39.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19313638 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ACTIVITY PRICING | ZEROUAL, OMAR | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19313638 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ACTIVITY PRICING | ZEROUAL, OMAR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19313638 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ACTIVITY PRICING | ZEROUAL, OMAR | 3629 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial