Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Optimdosing LLC has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit, which defines the focus for the company's pending matters.
The busiest examiner for the company is LAM, ELIZA ANNE, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending office action in the entire portfolio, this examiner handles all of the company's current workload. This creates a single point of interaction between the company and the patent office.
The presence of 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector indicates the current area of prosecution. LAM, ELIZA ANNE manages this 1 pending action within the 1 distinct art unit involved. This prosecution profile shows that the company is currently focusing its legal efforts on a single application and maintains a streamlined presence.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM, ELIZA ANNE | 1 | 38.4% | +31.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18939802 | SMART NUTRITION DOSING | LAM, ELIZA ANNE | 3d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18939802 | SMART NUTRITION DOSING | LAM, ELIZA ANNE | 3d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18939802 | SMART NUTRITION DOSING | LAM, ELIZA ANNE | 3681 | §101§103Other | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Nov 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial