Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Optopol Technology Sp Z O O manages 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while the technical area is focused, the cases are being reviewed by different individuals. This distribution provides the company with exposure to two different examiner perspectives even though the matters are concentrated within a single art unit. Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct art unit provides a consistent administrative baseline for the portfolio.
HALL, ELIZABETH MARY CAMPBEL is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is currently managing 1 pending office action for the company, while the other pending matter is handled by a different examiner. Because the 2 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct examiners, the company must navigate the specific preferences and requirements of multiple individuals. This distribution can lead to varying timelines for the resolution of the pending office actions, as each examiner may have different average processing speeds and examination styles within the 1 distinct art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALL, ELIZABETH MARY CAMPBEL | 1 | 69.0% | +8.3% |
| WILKES, ZACHARY W | 1 | 66.5% | +22.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18751713 | DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMAN EYE USING OCT TECHNOLOGY | HALL, ELIZABETH MARY CAMPBEL | — |
| 18657304 | DEVICE FOR EYESIGHT EXAMINATION, IN PARTICULAR FOR PERFORMING FIELD OF VISION TESTS | WILKES, ZACHARY W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18657304 | DEVICE FOR EYESIGHT EXAMINATION, IN PARTICULAR FOR PERFORMING FIELD OF VISION TESTS | WILKES, ZACHARY W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2872 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18751713 | DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMAN EYE USING OCT TECHNOLOGY | HALL, ELIZABETH MARY CAMPBEL | 2872 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 24, 2024 |
| 18657304 | DEVICE FOR EYESIGHT EXAMINATION, IN PARTICULAR FOR PERFORMING FIELD OF VISION TESTS | WILKES, ZACHARY W | 2872 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialOptopol Technology Sp Z O O has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
Elizabeth Mary Campbel Hall has the most, with 1 of Optopol Technology Sp Z O O's pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
