Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Orbray Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Orbray Co. Ltd. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates a broader technical or administrative footprint compared to portfolios where all matters are concentrated under a single point of contact. The use of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations may span different sub-specialties within the broader biotechnology sector.

The busiest examiner for the company is MARTIN, PAUL C, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner handles a portion of the company's total 2 pending office actions. The remaining pending action is managed by the other of the 2 distinct examiners, requiring the company to navigate multiple examiner preferences simultaneously. This split workload means that the prosecution strategy cannot be entirely centralized, as each examiner may have different interpretations of the prior art or procedural requirements.

With 2 pending office actions in total, the portfolio is in a state of active review across multiple channels. The presence of 2 distinct examiners provides the company with different perspectives on their patent applications. Practitioners should monitor the progress of the 1 busiest examiner pending office action under MARTIN, PAUL C while also addressing the requirements of the second examiner to ensure consistent results across the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MARTIN, PAUL C 1 41.8% +21.6%
SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P 1 47.0% +38.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17805592 METHOD FOR COLLECTING LIVING TISSUE MARTIN, PAUL C 14d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17805592 METHOD FOR COLLECTING LIVING TISSUE MARTIN, PAUL C 14d
17647550 DENTAL IMPLANT BODY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DENTAL IMPLANT BODY SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P 39d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1653 1
3772 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17805592 METHOD FOR COLLECTING LIVING TISSUE MARTIN, PAUL C 1653 §103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jun 06, 2022
17647550 DENTAL IMPLANT BODY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DENTAL IMPLANT BODY SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P 3772 §102 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Jan 10, 2022

Managing Orbray Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month