Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd. is managing 4 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This level of activity indicates a consistent effort to expand its intellectual property holdings in the medical device field. The company is currently responding to various technical and legal challenges across four different patent applications, requiring a coordinated approach to its mechanical claims.

The prosecution involves 4 distinct examiners and 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of all four actions within a single art unit suggests that the company's technology is highly specialized and falls under the jurisdiction of one specific technical group at the USPTO. FREDRICKSON, COURTNEY B is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since each of the four actions is assigned to a different examiner, the company must satisfy the specific requirements of four separate individual reviewers within the same technical department. This structure allows the company to focus its legal strategy on the standards of a single art unit while addressing the preferences of four different reviewers.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FREDRICKSON, COURTNEY B 1 75.4% +29.6%
SHAH, NILAY J 1 76.3% +46.9%
ZAMORY, JUSTIN L 1 72.7% +17.6%
DIOP, FATIMATA SAHRA 1 68.6% +38.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18192231 MULTI-FILAR CATHETER BODY CONSTRUCTION ZAMORY, JUSTIN L —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17326933 PRE-SHAPED MEDICAL DEVICES DIOP, FATIMATA SAHRA 98d overdue
18825690 VARIABLE FLEXIBILITY CATHETER SUPPORT FRAME FREDRICKSON, COURTNEY B —
18793046 BALLOON ANCHORING GUIDE CATHETER EXTENSION SHAH, NILAY J —
18192231 MULTI-FILAR CATHETER BODY CONSTRUCTION ZAMORY, JUSTIN L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 4

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18825690 VARIABLE FLEXIBILITY CATHETER SUPPORT FRAME FREDRICKSON, COURTNEY B 3783 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 05, 2024
18793046 BALLOON ANCHORING GUIDE CATHETER EXTENSION SHAH, NILAY J 3783 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 02, 2024
18192231 MULTI-FILAR CATHETER BODY CONSTRUCTION ZAMORY, JUSTIN L 3783 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 29, 2023
17326933 PRE-SHAPED MEDICAL DEVICES DIOP, FATIMATA SAHRA 3783 §103 Final Rejection 98d overdue Pending May 21, 2021

Managing Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd. have?

Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd. applications?

Courtney B Fredrickson has the most, with 1 of Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Orbusneich Medical Pte. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month