Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Oribiotech Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Oribiotech Ltd. is currently processing 4 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, which indicates some level of concentration in the review process. This arrangement means that at least one examiner is handling more than one of the pending matters, allowing for some consistency in prosecution across the portfolio.

The workload is distributed across 3 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's chemical technologies are specialized enough to fall into three different regulatory categories at the patent office. WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently responsible for 2 busiest examiner pending office actions. This examiner handles 2 of the 4 pending office actions currently active for the company.

With WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN managing 2 busiest examiner pending office actions, this examiner is a critical figure in the company's overall strategy. The applicant can leverage the interactions with this single examiner to potentially streamline the 2 busiest examiner pending actions she oversees. However, the presence of 3 distinct art units and 3 distinct examiners in total means that the company must still maintain a flexible approach to satisfy the requirements of the other two examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN 2 65.3% +42.6%
BRIDGES, DONAVAN LEE 1 — —
RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW 1 73.4% +33.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18694211 BIOREACTOR WITH SENSOR ELEMENT BRIDGES, DONAVAN LEE —
18681272 OUTLET VALVE FOR A CONTAINER WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18713525 A BIOREACTOR COMPRISING A BAFFLE WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN 30d overdue
18681272 OUTLET VALVE FOR A CONTAINER WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN —
18573939 ASEPTIC CONNECTOR RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1798 2
1758 1
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18713525 A BIOREACTOR COMPRISING A BAFFLE WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN 1798 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending May 24, 2024
18694211 BIOREACTOR WITH SENSOR ELEMENT BRIDGES, DONAVAN LEE 1758 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2024
18681272 OUTLET VALVE FOR A CONTAINER WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN 1798 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2024
18573939 ASEPTIC CONNECTOR RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW 3783 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 22, 2023

Managing Oribiotech Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Oribiotech Ltd. have?

Oribiotech Ltd. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Oribiotech Ltd. applications?

Patricia Kathryn Wright has the most, with 2 of Oribiotech Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Oribiotech Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month