Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Oriole Networks Ltd.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Oriole Networks Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly focused prosecution state where all of the company's current activity is centered on a single matter. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology currently under review falls within a specific niche of the Communications sector.

CORS, NATHAN M is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action, which is the only active matter for the company. Because there is 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution process is centralized with a single official. The relationship between the 1 pending office action and the 1 distinct examiner simplifies the administrative tracking of this portfolio while focusing all current efforts on a single proceeding. This assignment ensures that all communication is directed through CORS, NATHAN M within the 1 distinct art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CORS, NATHAN M 1 77.6% +5.5%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2634 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19448079 NETWORK SUB-SYSTEM CORS, NATHAN M 2634 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 13, 2026

Managing Oriole Networks Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Oriole Networks Ltd. have?

Oriole Networks Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Oriole Networks Ltd. applications?

Nathan M Cors has the most, with 1 of Oriole Networks Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Oriole Networks Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month