Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Orion Polymer Corp. maintains a company patent portfolio focused on the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The current prosecution landscape is focused, with a pending office action assigned to a distinct examiner. This action is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the company's active intellectual property efforts are currently concentrated in a specific technical niche.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SASTRI, SATYA B, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Given that there is only the pending office action total, this examiner is the sole point of contact for the company's active matters at the patent office. The outcome of the company's current applications will be determined by the specific examination style and requirements of this individual.
The presence of a distinct art unit and examiner for the pending workload simplifies the administrative burden on the company. Practitioners can develop a highly targeted strategy for SASTRI, SATYA B without needing to coordinate across multiple officials. This streamlined approach is characteristic of a portfolio with a single, focused point of active prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SASTRI, SATYA B | 1 | 62.6% | +29.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18670004 | QUATERNIZED POLYAROMATICS FOR USE IN ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICES | SASTRI, SATYA B | 19d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18670004 | QUATERNIZED POLYAROMATICS FOR USE IN ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICES | SASTRI, SATYA B | 19d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18670004 | QUATERNIZED POLYAROMATICS FOR USE IN ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICES | SASTRI, SATYA B | 1762 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 19d overdue | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial