Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ortiv-Q3 Research Pvt Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single action represents the entirety of the company's active prosecution before the USPTO. The concentration in Chemistry & Materials suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are focused on specific material science or chemical processes.
The portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates a highly centralized review process, where all pending matters are handled by a single individual within one technical department. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution path is not complicated by differing standards across multiple art units or varying examiner interpretations.
Herbert, Madison Taylor is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. Since this examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action, they are the primary point of contact for the company's current applications. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific examination style of this individual to effectively advance the company's interests within the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HERBERT, MADISON TAYLOR | 1 | 59.1% | +53.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17919622 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MICRODIALYSIS FOR IN-VITRO RELEASE TESTING OF DOSAGE FORMS | HERBERT, MADISON TAYLOR | 34d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17919622 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MICRODIALYSIS FOR IN-VITRO RELEASE TESTING OF DOSAGE FORMS | HERBERT, MADISON TAYLOR | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1758 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17919622 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MICRODIALYSIS FOR IN-VITRO RELEASE TESTING OF DOSAGE FORMS | HERBERT, MADISON TAYLOR | 1758 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Oct 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial