Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Orzapro LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's current activity is concentrated, reflecting a focus within the patent office. Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct art unit involved suggests a specialized focus within the medical devices field. The limited scope of pending activity means that the company's immediate patent strategy is concentrated on 1 point of contact.
The busiest examiner is LYNCH, MEGAN E, who is managing 1 pending office action. Since there is 1 pending action for the company, this 1 examiner is responsible for the current prosecution activity. Practitioners working with this portfolio will interact with this 1 examiner and 1 art unit for the active matter. The outcome of this 1 case will define the company's current patent status in this technology area. This centralization allows for a targeted approach to prosecution, as all efforts are directed toward satisfying the requirements of LYNCH, MEGAN E. Building a clear record with this 1 examiner is the primary task for the company's current prosecution efforts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYNCH, MEGAN E | 1 | 38.2% | +40.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19538920 | SHOCK-ABSORBING DANCE SHOE ASSEMBLY | LYNCH, MEGAN E | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19538920 | SHOCK-ABSORBING DANCE SHOE ASSEMBLY | LYNCH, MEGAN E | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19538920 | SHOCK-ABSORBING DANCE SHOE ASSEMBLY | LYNCH, MEGAN E | 3732 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 12, 2026 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial