Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Oscilloscape LLC

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Oscilloscape LLC is currently navigating 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. The portfolio is distributed between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, ensuring that each of the company's pending applications is reviewed by a different individual in a different specialized group at the USPTO. This distribution helps to diversify the company's prosecution risk across the Communications sector.

ABEBE, DANIEL DEMELASH is the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This 1 action represents a portion of the 2 total pending office actions for the company. The distribution across 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's communications technology is broad enough to be examined by different departments. This split between 2 distinct examiners ensures that no single examiner controls the entire pending portfolio.

With 2 pending office actions spread across 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners, the company's immediate IP goals are split into two independent paths. This structure ensures that the prosecution of one application does not directly influence the other. For a company in the Communications sector, this distribution provides a balanced approach to securing patent rights across different technical niches. ABEBE, DANIEL DEMELASH handles the busiest_examiner_pending count of 1.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
50% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ABEBE, DANIEL DEMELASH 1 89.7% +7.4%
MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW 1 53.1% +34.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19001123 CONTROLLER FOR VISUAL DISPLAY OF MUSIC ABEBE, DANIEL DEMELASH —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18024168 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR NEURAL STIMULATION VIA MUSIC AND SYNCHRONIZED RHYTHMIC STIMULATION MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW 103d overdue

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18024168 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR NEURAL STIMULATION VIA MUSIC AND SYNCHRONIZED RHYTHMIC STIMULATION MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW 103d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2657 1
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19001123 CONTROLLER FOR VISUAL DISPLAY OF MUSIC ABEBE, DANIEL DEMELASH 2657 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 24, 2024
18024168 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR NEURAL STIMULATION VIA MUSIC AND SYNCHRONIZED RHYTHMIC STIMULATION MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW 3791 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection 103d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2023

Managing Oscilloscape LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Oscilloscape LLC have?

Oscilloscape LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Oscilloscape LLC applications?

Daniel Demelash Abebe has the most, with 1 of Oscilloscape LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Oscilloscape LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month